Page 2 of 3
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 1:47 am
by Musashi
It's not ingenious at all. They could easily have fit everything that the gameboy is sued for into a control scheme for the standard controller.The standard controllers have screens to list all of the different types of information the GBAs would be used for then? Also, you must remember, there is still the option to have a single player game.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 2:00 am
by Evangelion
It's not ingenious at all. They could easily have fit everything that the gameboy is sued for into a control scheme for the standard controller.The standard controllers have screens to list all of the different types of information the GBAs would be used for then? Also, you must remember, there is still the option to have a single player game.Dreamcast is the pioneer of screen controllers. Dreamcast was the trend setter for all the next-gen consoles.Oh HanK, for that little comment of yours...
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 4:21 am
by Christian
it comes out Feburary 10th you dumb canuck
and the game will be good just like every other Final Fantasy (although this one is more Gauntlet/Baldur's Gate Dark Alliance style than a normal FF). i do agree about the gameboy for multiplayer thing being a little expensive (ie. wallet goes ouch). but the concept is a cool idea and most of my friends have GBA's anyway so i'll be picking it up :Pnow if i could just get FFXI, CoD, and Warcraft III back :/
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 4:51 am
by Musashi
Dreamcast is the pioneer of screen controllers. Dreamcast was the trend setter for all the next-gen consoles.I know, why do you think the DC is my favourite console?
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 4:57 am
by HanK
The screen doesn't offer anything that couldn't have been fit into the game with just the standard controller. And to get the most out of singleplayer you're required to use the Gameboy.
Posted: Sun Feb 01, 2004 11:35 am
by Bane
Dreamcast is the pioneer of screen controllers. Dreamcast was the trend setter for all the next-gen consoles.I know, why do you think the DC is my favourite console?i still play it, over and over again when my PS2 mod-chip isnt working. i need an upgrade
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 12:09 am
by Musashi
Well Hank, it's better than four of them, isn't it?The game was made for those either with the money, or the equipment to play. If you don't like it, I don't think Nintendo cares. They only care about those who can spend the money to play the game, those gullable people...
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 12:27 am
by HanK
LoL, and we're back to my initial point, that Nintendo did this as a blatent attempt to force people to give them more money than necessary to enjoy a high prfoile game.
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 12:33 am
by DesuMacchi
a high [size=24:bb3a109b1c]prfoile [/size:bb3a109b1c]game.And those kinds of games ARE ??
Posted: Mon Feb 02, 2004 12:53 am
by HanK
From dictionary.com:prfoile-noun, Des, STFU.
and the game will be good just like every other Final Fantasy (although this one is more Gauntlet/Baldur's Gate Dark Alliance style than a normal FF). i do agree about the gameboy for multiplayer thing being a little expensive (ie. wallet goes ouch). but the concept is a cool idea and most of my friends have GBA's anyway so i'll be picking it up :Pnow if i could just get FFXI, CoD, and Warcraft III back :/