Page 2 of 3
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 12:31 am
by Darth Bob
well it can be like SW galactic battlegrounds and they rip an engine. of course it wouldnt be a strategy engine but hey hey hey its all about engine ripping isnt it?
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 4:27 am
by TacoBell
As long as there is realistic recoil a la a bullet-shooting gun, it could be good. And the 16 player limit makes no sense for what are supposed to be major battles, but any more people on and there will be a good deal of lag for most people anyway.I thought it said 16+. 16 Plus.
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 4:30 am
by HanK
I was going based on what everyone else said.
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 5:24 am
by Crash
i think jka had a similar hype to this, and we all know how jka turned out.....i for one will hold out on this for a few weeks......so that you guys can get eet and test it
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 7:42 am
by Bane
i think jka had a similar hype to this, and we all know how jka turned out.....i for one will hold out on this for a few weeks......so that you guys can get eet and test it :Ddfa's without movement in the air? i dont see any silly lightsaber bullshit on this one.
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 8:18 am
by Kamm
Bunny hopping rocket-launchers?!
Posted: Fri Aug 20, 2004 10:37 pm
by BloodViper
this better not turn out like T3: War of the Machines
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:14 am
by Zaphinkhiel
if it's really ONLY 16 players at one time then what's the sense of calling the game battlefront eh?if this is gonna be sexy i'm sure to bring my laggyness to it
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:27 am
by PsychoMidget
looking forward to allocating anyones face to its proper containerim so getting that game
Posted: Sat Aug 21, 2004 7:12 pm
by gramps
we could set up ladder matches like COD did!im down.