Page 1 of 2
killzone
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:39 pm
by Bane
haha! this game is so gonna own the ass and its for PS2 (hear that des!). Its pretty much playstations answer to halo, though the consept looks nothing like halo whatsoever. theres no official site yet, atleast i cant find one, but screenies..
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:45 pm
by HanK
This is about the 10th game to claim to be PS2's answer to Halo. None of them have been even close, I see no reason why this should be.
Posted: Mon Jan 19, 2004 11:49 pm
by DesuMacchi
lolnice try rookie :)Nothing on the PS2 will compare to the graphical power of the Xbox, point blank.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:09 am
by Bane
sure it wont, never said that it would
everyone knows that the xbox has better grafix then the ps2, and lets not get into another pointless argument about it. this game looks fucking great, halo or no halo. It might turn out to be a complet flunk or somthing that can even match halo (still, not in grafix). halo is already a classic game, and will probably stay one for a long time, but new year, new shit for playstation and xbox alike.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:14 am
by DaikatanaGenshu
Well, to add to the flame that is the FoU console war, I will say this.No one will ever convinve me that graphics make a game. Ok, sure, they may enhance the experience, but believe it or not, some of my most favorite games of all time are on the SNES or are flash games.Yes, Halo was good, but it was a lot of eye candy imo.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:26 am
by Ender
no crosshairs garbage
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:29 am
by Evangelion
Well, to add to the flame that is the FoU console war, I will say this.No one will ever convinve me that graphics make a game. Ok, sure, they may enhance the experience, but believe it or not, some of my most favorite games of all time are on the SNES or are flash games.Yes, Halo was good, but it was a lot of eye candy imo.Dai, word to the max.I mean c'mon, Super Metroid, Super Mario RPG, Chrono Trigger, Legend of Zelda, Contra III, Super Mario World, Final Fantasy IV, V, VI. You cannot even touch those games with many of the games today. Nothing like the classics.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:36 am
by Bane
Well, to add to the flame that is the FoU console war, I will say this.No one will ever convinve me that graphics make a game. Ok, sure, they may enhance the experience, but believe it or not, some of my most favorite games of all time are on the SNES or are flash games.Yes, Halo was good, but it was a lot of eye candy imo.Dai, word to the max.I mean c'mon, Super Metroid, Super Mario RPG, Chrono Trigger, Legend of Zelda, Contra III, Super Mario World, Final Fantasy IV, V, VI. You cannot even touch those games with many of the games today. Nothing like the classics.damn strait you cant. Also the old sega consols.... fucking great...
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 12:54 am
by Jordan
Up, up, down, down, left, right, left, right, b, a, start!Ha, yay for old school gaming! :lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao::lmao:But, on topic...Halo=classic. Why do I need a "wanna-be" on my PS2. I love my ps2 to death, really I do. But if I want Halo action...i'll get it for my PC, or play it on Xbox.
Posted: Tue Jan 20, 2004 4:29 am
by CrazyTom
you know whats funny? that assualt rifle in the screen looks exactly like the halo assault rifle except that one has a little gap at the top